Blairlogie Pine Investment Limited Partnership vs Norfolk Mortgage Trust Fund
Side-by-side facts extracted from manager-published IM/PDS/SIPO documents. 0 fields match, 0 differ, 0 disclosed by only one fund.
Why these differ
Generated 2026-05-20 from the structured facts below. Verify against the source IM/PDS before relying on this summary for investment decisions.
The most material structural difference is asset class and investment horizon. Blairlogie Pine Investment Limited Partnership is a forestry-focused limited partnership managed by Forest Enterprises Limited (Masterton), targeting a "9.8% p.a. projected IRR (gross, before tax)" through a finite-life vehicle where returns are largely deferred — distributions are not expected until 2034 via carbon credit sales, and capital is recovered at exit. Norfolk Mortgage Trust Fund, managed by Norfolk Mortgage Management Limited (Auckland) and supervised by Public Trust, is a PIE-eligible private credit trust investing in first mortgages with an LVR cap of 75%, targeting returns "to exceed the Six-month term deposit rate (published by the RBNZ) by 1.4% per annum (after the deduction of fees and expenses)," with monthly distributions and a 183-day redemption notice period.
Liquidity profiles differ significantly. Norfolk discloses detailed gate provisions — redemptions may be suspended if requests exceed 5% of units within three months, with a mandatory investor meeting triggered above 20% — while Blairlogie's IM does not specify comparable gate mechanics. Norfolk carries a 2.5% management fee; Blairlogie's IM does not disclose an equivalent figure. Minimum investment is NZD 5,000 for Norfolk versus NZD 13,538 for Blairlogie. Norfolk has operated since 2006 and is not wholesale-only; Blairlogie's wholesale status is not specified in the extracted facts. Both funds record redemption frequency as at-exit, though Norfolk's monthly distributions provide interim income that Blairlogie does not offer until the mid-2030s.
Verify all details against each fund's source IM or PDS before relying on this summary.
Fact-by-fact comparison
Source documents
Blairlogie Pine Investment Limited Partnership
No documents ingested yet.
Methodology
Facts extracted via Claude Sonnet 4.6 from manager-published IM/PDS/SIPO PDFs. Confidence tiers: ●verified (all required keys populated), ◐inferred (some required keys null), ○not on file. Where IM and SIPO/PDS disclose the same fact, verified takes precedence over inferred.
The “Why these differ” summary above is generated once per pair by Sonnet from the structured facts in this table and cached as JSON. It is regenerated when either fund’s facts change.
Wholesale-only — for eligible investors per FMCA Schedule 1. Not financial advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Verify each fact against the source IM/PDS before relying on it for investment decisions.
