Midlands Income Wholesale Fund vs PG Balanced Fund
Side-by-side facts extracted from manager-published IM/PDS/SIPO documents. 0 fields match, 0 differ, 0 disclosed by only one fund.
Why these differ
Generated 2026-05-19 from the structured facts below. Verify against the source IM/PDS before relying on this summary for investment decisions.
The most material structural difference is investor eligibility: the Midlands Income Wholesale Fund is restricted to wholesale investors only, with a minimum investment of NZD 100,000, while the PG Balanced Fund is open to retail and wholesale investors alike at a minimum of NZD 1,000 — a threshold one hundred times lower.
Beyond access, the funds pursue fundamentally different strategies. Midlands is a private credit fund deploying capital via first-mortgage lending, with a disclosed maximum LVR of 75% and a target return expressed as "income return pre-tax (but after fees and expenses) at a level which exceeds the average 3 month term deposit rate advertised by all relevant New Zealand registered banks." PG Balanced Fund's asset class, security type, LVR policy, and target return are not specified in the extracted facts, making direct strategy comparison impossible on those dimensions.
Structurally, both are PIE trusts and both carry PIR eligibility. Midlands is supervised by Trustees Executors Limited and has operated since July 2021; PG Balanced Fund's supervisor is The New Zealand Guardian Trust Company Limited, and no inception date is on file. Midlands distributes quarterly and offers redemption on 30 days' notice, subject to a gate provision that can defer or instalment redemptions where aggregate withdrawal requests within any three-month period exceed 5% of units on issue. PG Balanced Fund's redemption terms, distribution frequency, and gate provisions are not disclosed in the extracted data.
Neither fund's FSP number is on file in the extracted facts. Verify all details against each fund's current IM or PDS before relying on this summary.
Fact-by-fact comparison
Source documents
Methodology
Facts extracted via Claude Sonnet 4.6 from manager-published IM/PDS/SIPO PDFs. Confidence tiers: ●verified (all required keys populated), ◐inferred (some required keys null), ○not on file. Where IM and SIPO/PDS disclose the same fact, verified takes precedence over inferred.
The “Why these differ” summary above is generated once per pair by Sonnet from the structured facts in this table and cached as JSON. It is regenerated when either fund’s facts change.
Wholesale-only — for eligible investors per FMCA Schedule 1. Not financial advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Verify each fact against the source IM/PDS before relying on it for investment decisions.
