Midlands Income Wholesale Fund vs MyFarm KiwiFruit Fund
Side-by-side facts extracted from manager-published IM/PDS/SIPO documents. 0 fields match, 0 differ, 0 disclosed by only one fund.
Why these differ
Generated 2026-05-20 from the structured facts below. Verify against the source IM/PDS before relying on this summary for investment decisions.
The most material structural difference between these two funds is asset class and return objective. Midlands Income Wholesale Fund is a private credit fund secured by first mortgages on New Zealand property, targeting an "income return pre-tax (but after fees and expenses) at a level which exceeds the average 3 month term deposit rate advertised by all relevant New Zealand registered banks" — an income-oriented, floating benchmark. MyFarm KiwiFruit Fund is a property fund with direct exposure to kiwifruit orchards, targeting a "targeted long-term total return, including cash distributions and capital growth, of 10% p.a." — a blended income-plus-capital-growth objective with a fixed percentage anchor.
On structure, Midlands is a PIE unit trust, making it PIR-eligible for tax purposes; MyFarm discloses AIP eligibility but its IM facts do not confirm PIE status or PIR eligibility. Midlands discloses an LVR cap of 75% and a supervisor (Trustees Executors Limited); MyFarm's document does not specify an LVR limit or name a supervisor. MyFarm reports AUM of NZD 210 million; no AUM figure is on file for Midlands.
Both funds are wholesale-only with a quarterly distribution frequency. Redemption differs: Midlands operates on an at-exit basis with 30 days' notice and a gate provision triggered when redemption requests exceed 5% of units on issue within three months; MyFarm discloses quarterly redemption but its IM facts do not detail gate provisions or notice periods.
Minimum investment for Midlands is NZD 100,000; MyFarm's document does not specify a minimum. Verify all details against each fund's current IM or PDS before relying on this summary.
Fact-by-fact comparison
Source documents
Methodology
Facts extracted via Claude Sonnet 4.6 from manager-published IM/PDS/SIPO PDFs. Confidence tiers: ●verified (all required keys populated), ◐inferred (some required keys null), ○not on file. Where IM and SIPO/PDS disclose the same fact, verified takes precedence over inferred.
The “Why these differ” summary above is generated once per pair by Sonnet from the structured facts in this table and cached as JSON. It is regenerated when either fund’s facts change.
Wholesale-only — for eligible investors per FMCA Schedule 1. Not financial advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Verify each fact against the source IM/PDS before relying on it for investment decisions.
