Skip to main content
Wholesale Investor NZWholesale Investor NZ

Hunter Diversified Private Credit Fund vs PG Balanced Fund

Side-by-side facts extracted from manager-published IM/PDS/SIPO documents. 0 fields match, 0 differ, 0 disclosed by only one fund.

Why these differ

Generated 2026-05-19 from the structured facts below. Verify against the source IM/PDS before relying on this summary for investment decisions.

The most material structural difference is asset class and strategy: the Hunter Diversified Private Credit Fund is a dedicated private credit vehicle targeting illiquid lending assets, while the PG Balanced Fund is a diversified multi-asset fund — a fundamentally different risk and return profile that shapes every other comparison point.

On return expectations, Hunter discloses a verbatim target of "4% per annum higher than the New Zealand Official Cash Rate over a rolling 3-year period"; the PG Balanced Fund's extracted facts include no equivalent target return disclosure. Hunter's management fee is stated at 0.83% per annum; PG Balanced Fund's IM does not specify a fee figure in the extracted data.

Access and liquidity differ considerably. Hunter requires a NZD 100,000 minimum investment and is explicitly wholesale-only, with monthly redemptions subject to gate provisions — suspensions can last up to six months and partial or zero redemptions are possible if liquidity is insufficient. PG Balanced Fund carries a NZD 1,000 minimum and is not restricted to wholesale investors, suggesting broader retail accessibility, though its redemption terms are not specified in the extracted facts.

Both funds are PIE-structured unit trusts, both are PIR-eligible, and both share the same supervisor, The New Zealand Guardian Trust Company Limited. Hunter has a disclosed inception date of December 2016; no inception date is provided for the PG Balanced Fund. Hunter's manager is Harbour Asset Management Limited; PG Balanced Fund is managed by PG Funds Limited.

Always verify these details against each fund's current IM, PDS, or SIPO before making any investment decision.

Fact-by-fact comparison

verified inferred match differ one-side only

Source documents

Hunter Diversified Private Credit Fund

No documents ingested yet.

PG Balanced Fund

No documents ingested yet.

Methodology

Facts extracted via Claude Sonnet 4.6 from manager-published IM/PDS/SIPO PDFs. Confidence tiers: ●verified (all required keys populated), ◐inferred (some required keys null), ○not on file. Where IM and SIPO/PDS disclose the same fact, verified takes precedence over inferred.

The “Why these differ” summary above is generated once per pair by Sonnet from the structured facts in this table and cached as JSON. It is regenerated when either fund’s facts change.

Wholesale-only — for eligible investors per FMCA Schedule 1. Not financial advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Verify each fact against the source IM/PDS before relying on it for investment decisions.