Skip to main content
Wholesale Investor NZWholesale Investor NZ

Hunter Diversified Private Credit Fund vs MyFarm Solar Fund

Side-by-side facts extracted from manager-published IM/PDS/SIPO documents. 0 fields match, 0 differ, 0 disclosed by only one fund.

Why these differ

Generated 2026-05-20 from the structured facts below. Verify against the source IM/PDS before relying on this summary for investment decisions.

The most material structural difference is asset class and return mechanism: the Hunter Diversified Private Credit Fund deploys capital across private credit instruments and targets "4% per annum higher than the New Zealand Official Cash Rate over a rolling 3-year period," a floating benchmark tied to monetary policy. MyFarm Solar Fund invests in renewable energy infrastructure — specifically solar — and targets "Forecast cash distributions of 10-12% p.a., paid quarterly," with an after-tax equivalent framed as "an average 15% p.a. return on a fully taxable investment, from years two to ten, assuming a tax rate of 33%." These are fundamentally different risk and return profiles, not directly comparable on yield alone.

On structure, Hunter is a PIE unit trust supervised by The New Zealand Guardian Trust Company Limited, making it PIR-eligible; MyFarm Solar is wholesale-only and AIP-eligible, with no supervisor disclosed and no PIE status indicated. Hunter's management fee is disclosed at 0.83% per annum; MyFarm's IM does not specify a management fee percentage. Hunter discloses gate provisions allowing suspensions of up to six months and partial or zero redemptions in low-liquidity conditions; MyFarm's documents do not detail equivalent redemption mechanics. MyFarm discloses a maximum LVR of 35%; Hunter's IM does not specify an LVR cap. Minimum investment is NZ$100,000 for Hunter versus NZ$50,000 for MyFarm. Both distribute quarterly. Hunter launched December 2016; MyFarm Solar launched June 2025, with AUM disclosed at NZ$13.9 million and no equivalent track record yet established.

Verify all details against the source IM, PDS, or SIPO for each fund before relying on this summary.

Fact-by-fact comparison

verified inferred match differ one-side only

Source documents

Hunter Diversified Private Credit Fund

No documents ingested yet.

MyFarm Solar Fund

No documents ingested yet.

Methodology

Facts extracted via Claude Sonnet 4.6 from manager-published IM/PDS/SIPO PDFs. Confidence tiers: ●verified (all required keys populated), ◐inferred (some required keys null), ○not on file. Where IM and SIPO/PDS disclose the same fact, verified takes precedence over inferred.

The “Why these differ” summary above is generated once per pair by Sonnet from the structured facts in this table and cached as JSON. It is regenerated when either fund’s facts change.

Wholesale-only — for eligible investors per FMCA Schedule 1. Not financial advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Verify each fact against the source IM/PDS before relying on it for investment decisions.