Skip to main content
Wholesale Investor NZWholesale Investor NZ

Hunter Diversified Private Credit Fund vs Midlands Income Wholesale Fund

Side-by-side facts extracted from manager-published IM/PDS/SIPO documents. 0 fields match, 0 differ, 0 disclosed by only one fund.

Why these differ

Generated 2026-05-19 from the structured facts below. Verify against the source IM/PDS before relying on this summary for investment decisions.

The most material structural difference between these two funds is liquidity. Hunter Diversified Private Credit Fund offers monthly redemptions, though subject to suspension for up to six months or partial/zero redemption if liquidity is insufficient. Midlands Income Wholesale Fund operates on an at-exit basis with 30 days' notice required, and its gate provision triggers when withdrawal requests for the same holding exceed 5% of units on issue within three months — at which point Midlands may redeem by instalments or defer to a period of its choosing. Investors with shorter liquidity horizons will encounter meaningfully different terms under each structure.

The funds also differ in their return benchmarks. Hunter targets "4% per annum higher than the New Zealand Official Cash Rate over a rolling 3-year period," a floating spread above the OCR. Midlands targets "income return pre-tax (but after fees and expenses) at a level which exceeds the average 3 month term deposit rate advertised by all relevant New Zealand registered banks" — a lower absolute hurdle in most rate environments. Hunter discloses a management fee of 0.83% per annum; Midlands' IM does not specify a comparable figure in the extracted data. Midlands discloses a maximum LVR of 75% and first-mortgage security type; Hunter's IM does not specify either. Both funds share the same minimum investment (NZD 100,000), PIE and PIR eligibility, unit trust structure, and quarterly distributions. Hunter was incepted December 2016; Midlands in July 2021, giving Hunter a longer observable track record.

Always verify these details against each fund's current source IM or PDS before making any investment decision.

Fact-by-fact comparison

verified inferred match differ one-side only

Source documents

Hunter Diversified Private Credit Fund

No documents ingested yet.

Midlands Income Wholesale Fund

No documents ingested yet.

Methodology

Facts extracted via Claude Sonnet 4.6 from manager-published IM/PDS/SIPO PDFs. Confidence tiers: ●verified (all required keys populated), ◐inferred (some required keys null), ○not on file. Where IM and SIPO/PDS disclose the same fact, verified takes precedence over inferred.

The “Why these differ” summary above is generated once per pair by Sonnet from the structured facts in this table and cached as JSON. It is regenerated when either fund’s facts change.

Wholesale-only — for eligible investors per FMCA Schedule 1. Not financial advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Verify each fact against the source IM/PDS before relying on it for investment decisions.