Skip to main content
Wholesale Investor NZWholesale Investor NZ

Devon Trans-Tasman Fund (Wholesale) vs Hunter Diversified Private Credit Fund

Side-by-side facts extracted from manager-published IM/PDS/SIPO documents. 0 fields match, 0 differ, 0 disclosed by only one fund.

Why these differ

Generated 2026-05-19 from the structured facts below. Verify against the source IM/PDS before relying on this summary for investment decisions.

The most material structural difference is asset class and liquidity profile. Devon Trans-Tasman Fund invests in listed Australasian equities and offers daily redemptions, while Hunter Diversified Private Credit Fund invests in private credit — an inherently less liquid asset class — with only monthly redemptions. Hunter's gate provisions are notably more detailed, specifying that suspensions "can last up to six months" and that the fund "may provide a partial (or zero) redemption" if liquidity is insufficient; Devon's IM states redemptions may be deferred or suspended but does not specify a maximum suspension period.

Both funds are PIE-eligible unit trusts sharing the same supervisor, The New Zealand Guardian Trust Company Limited. Management fees are close — Devon at 0.87% versus Hunter at 0.83% — but Devon adds a 10% performance fee; Hunter's IM does not disclose a performance fee. Hunter publishes a verbatim target return of "4% per annum higher than the New Zealand Official Cash Rate over a rolling 3-year period"; Devon's IM does not state a comparable target return figure. Hunter's minimum investment is $100,000 against Devon's $10,000, and Hunter distributes quarterly versus Devon's semi-annual distributions. Hunter discloses an inception date of December 2016; Devon's IM does not specify one. Notably, Hunter is managed by Harbour Asset Management Limited despite being a Hunter Capital product, while Devon is managed by Devon Funds Management Limited; Hunter's FSP number is not on file.

Verify all details against the source IM or PDS before relying on this summary.

Fact-by-fact comparison

verified inferred match differ one-side only

Source documents

Devon Trans-Tasman Fund (Wholesale)

No documents ingested yet.

Hunter Diversified Private Credit Fund

No documents ingested yet.

Methodology

Facts extracted via Claude Sonnet 4.6 from manager-published IM/PDS/SIPO PDFs. Confidence tiers: ●verified (all required keys populated), ◐inferred (some required keys null), ○not on file. Where IM and SIPO/PDS disclose the same fact, verified takes precedence over inferred.

The “Why these differ” summary above is generated once per pair by Sonnet from the structured facts in this table and cached as JSON. It is regenerated when either fund’s facts change.

Wholesale-only — for eligible investors per FMCA Schedule 1. Not financial advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Verify each fact against the source IM/PDS before relying on it for investment decisions.