Devon Sustainability Fund (Wholesale) vs Hunter Diversified Private Credit Fund
Side-by-side facts extracted from manager-published IM/PDS/SIPO documents. 0 fields match, 0 differ, 0 disclosed by only one fund.
Why these differ
Generated 2026-05-19 from the structured facts below. Verify against the source IM/PDS before relying on this summary for investment decisions.
The most material structural difference is asset class and return profile. Devon Sustainability Fund (Wholesale) invests in Australasian listed equities, giving investors mark-to-market pricing and daily liquidity. Hunter Diversified Private Credit Fund allocates to private credit, an illiquid asset class, with a stated target of "4% per annum higher than the New Zealand Official Cash Rate over a rolling 3-year period"; Devon's IM does not publish an equivalent target return figure.
Liquidity terms reflect this distinction. Devon offers daily redemptions, subject to a general ability to "suspend or defer redemptions" in certain circumstances. Hunter operates on monthly redemptions with more explicitly detailed gate provisions: suspensions can last up to six months, and if fund liquidity is insufficient, investors may receive partial or zero redemptions in a given month.
Both funds share the same supervisor (The New Zealand Guardian Trust Company Limited), the same PIE and unit trust structure, and both are PIR-eligible. Management fees are close — Devon at 0.87% and Hunter at 0.83% — though fee comparison across different asset classes has limited meaning. The minimum investment differs materially: Devon requires NZ$10,000 versus Hunter's NZ$100,000. Distributions are semi-annual for Devon and quarterly for Hunter. Hunter discloses an inception date of December 2016; Devon's IM does not specify one in the extracted data. Hunter's IM names Harbour Asset Management Limited as manager despite the Hunter Capital provider branding, which investors should clarify directly.
Always verify all details against each fund's current source IM or PDS before making any investment decision.
Fact-by-fact comparison
Source documents
Devon Sustainability Fund (Wholesale)
No documents ingested yet.
Hunter Diversified Private Credit Fund
No documents ingested yet.
Methodology
Facts extracted via Claude Sonnet 4.6 from manager-published IM/PDS/SIPO PDFs. Confidence tiers: ●verified (all required keys populated), ◐inferred (some required keys null), ○not on file. Where IM and SIPO/PDS disclose the same fact, verified takes precedence over inferred.
The “Why these differ” summary above is generated once per pair by Sonnet from the structured facts in this table and cached as JSON. It is regenerated when either fund’s facts change.
Wholesale-only — for eligible investors per FMCA Schedule 1. Not financial advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Verify each fact against the source IM/PDS before relying on it for investment decisions.
