Devon Global Sustainability Fund (Wholesale) vs Midlands Income Wholesale Fund
Side-by-side facts extracted from manager-published IM/PDS/SIPO documents. 0 fields match, 0 differ, 0 disclosed by only one fund.
Why these differ
Generated 2026-05-19 from the structured facts below. Verify against the source IM/PDS before relying on this summary for investment decisions.
The most material structural difference between these two funds is asset class and liquidity profile. Devon Global Sustainability Fund invests in listed global equities and offers daily redemptions, while Midlands Income Wholesale Fund invests in private credit secured by first mortgages and operates on an at-exit basis requiring 30 days' notice — a fundamentally less liquid structure. This difference shapes almost everything else about the two funds.
On returns, Devon targets "long-term total returns in excess of the index by investing in a selective portfolio of global equities," an index-relative growth objective. Midlands targets "income return pre-tax (but after fees and expenses) at a level which exceeds the average 3 month term deposit rate advertised by all relevant New Zealand registered banks," an income-focused benchmark tied to prevailing deposit rates. Midlands pays quarterly distributions; Devon's IM does not specify a distribution frequency.
Both are PIE unit trusts eligible for PIR taxation. Devon's minimum investment is NZD 10,000 versus Midlands' NZD 100,000. Devon's management fee is disclosed at 0.95%; Midlands' IM does not specify a comparable figure on file. Midlands discloses an LVR cap of 75% and first-mortgage security; Devon's IM contains no equivalent credit-risk disclosures, as expected for an equity fund. Gate provisions differ in structure: Devon reserves a general suspension right, while Midlands specifies a precise 5%-of-units-on-issue threshold within any three-month window before instalment or deferred redemption applies. Supervisors differ — New Zealand Guardian Trust for Devon, Trustees Executors for Midlands.
Verify all details against each fund's current IM or PDS before making any investment decision.
Fact-by-fact comparison
Source documents
Devon Global Sustainability Fund (Wholesale)
No documents ingested yet.
Methodology
Facts extracted via Claude Sonnet 4.6 from manager-published IM/PDS/SIPO PDFs. Confidence tiers: ●verified (all required keys populated), ◐inferred (some required keys null), ○not on file. Where IM and SIPO/PDS disclose the same fact, verified takes precedence over inferred.
The “Why these differ” summary above is generated once per pair by Sonnet from the structured facts in this table and cached as JSON. It is regenerated when either fund’s facts change.
Wholesale-only — for eligible investors per FMCA Schedule 1. Not financial advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Verify each fact against the source IM/PDS before relying on it for investment decisions.
