Skip to main content
Wholesale Investor NZWholesale Investor NZ

Devon Dividend Yield Fund (Wholesale) vs Norfolk Mortgage Trust Fund

Side-by-side facts extracted from manager-published IM/PDS/SIPO documents. 2 fields match, 9 differ, 7 disclosed by only one fund.

Why these differ

Generated 2026-05-19 from the structured facts below. Verify against the source IM/PDS before relying on this summary for investment decisions.

The most material structural difference is asset class: Devon Dividend Yield Fund holds listed equities, while Norfolk Mortgage Trust Fund deploys capital into private credit secured by first mortgages with a disclosed maximum LVR of 75%. This distinction drives almost every other difference between the two funds.

Liquidity terms reflect that divergence sharply. Devon offers daily redemptions, subject to a general suspension power where the manager notes "we have the ability, in certain circumstances to suspend or defer redemptions." Norfolk requires 183 days' notice for redemption and applies a formalised gate: the manager may suspend if requests exceed 5% of units within three months, and must call an investor meeting if requests exceed 20% of units on issue within that window.

On fees, Devon charges 0.62% management fee plus a 10% performance fee; Norfolk charges 2.5% management fee and discloses no performance fee. Norfolk publishes an explicit target return — "to exceed the Six-month term deposit rate (published by the RBNZ) by 1.4% per annum (after the deduction of fees and expenses)" — whereas Devon's IM does not specify a stated target return in the extracted data. Both are PIE structures and PIR-eligible. Devon distributes quarterly; Norfolk distributes monthly. Devon's minimum investment is NZ$10,000 versus Norfolk's NZ$5,000. Norfolk has been operating since 2006 and is not wholesale-only; Devon's equivalent disclosure is not specified in the extracted data. Both are supervised trusts, with Devon overseen by NZ Guardian Trust and Norfolk by Public Trust.

Verify all details against each fund's current IM or PDS before relying on this summary.

Fact-by-fact comparison

verified inferred match differ one-side only

Performance

FieldDevon Dividend Yield Fund (Wholesale)Norfolk Mortgage Trust FundStatus
Target return(not on file)to exceed the Six-month term deposit rate (published by the RBNZ) by 1.4% per annum (after the deduction of fees and expenses)
Minimum investment10,0005,000
Distribution frequencyquarterlymonthly
Inception(not on file)2006

Structure

FieldDevon Dividend Yield Fund (Wholesale)Norfolk Mortgage Trust FundStatus
Fund structureUnit TrustTrust
Wholesale-only?(not on file)No
PIE-structured?YesYes
PIR eligible?YesYes
Asset classequitiesprivate credit

Lending

FieldDevon Dividend Yield Fund (Wholesale)Norfolk Mortgage Trust FundStatus
Security type(not on file)first mortgage
LVR cap (%)(not on file)75

Fees

FieldDevon Dividend Yield Fund (Wholesale)Norfolk Mortgage Trust FundStatus
Management fee (%)0.622.5
Performance fee (%)10(not on file)

Liquidity

FieldDevon Dividend Yield Fund (Wholesale)Norfolk Mortgage Trust FundStatus
Redemption frequencydailyat-exit
Redemption notice (days)(not on file)183
Gate provisionsWe have the ability, in certain circumstances to suspend or defer redemptions.Manager may suspend redemptions if redemption requests exceed 5% of units within a 3 month period, or any economic or political circumstances which could affect the assets or business activities of the Trust. If requests within 3 months relate to more than 20% of units on issue, Manager may suspend redemptions and must call a meeting of investors.

Entities

FieldDevon Dividend Yield Fund (Wholesale)Norfolk Mortgage Trust FundStatus
Manager entityDevon Funds Management LimitedNorfolk Mortgage Management Limited
SupervisorThe New Zealand Guardian Trust Company LimitedPublic Trust

Methodology

Facts extracted via Claude Sonnet 4.6 from manager-published IM/PDS/SIPO PDFs. Confidence tiers: ●verified (all required keys populated), ◐inferred (some required keys null), ○not on file. Where IM and SIPO/PDS disclose the same fact, verified takes precedence over inferred.

The “Why these differ” summary above is generated once per pair by Sonnet from the structured facts in this table and cached as JSON. It is regenerated when either fund’s facts change.

Wholesale-only — for eligible investors per FMCA Schedule 1. Not financial advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Verify each fact against the source IM/PDS before relying on it for investment decisions.