Skip to main content
Wholesale Investor NZWholesale Investor NZ

Devon Dividend Yield Fund (Wholesale) vs Midlands Income Wholesale Fund

Side-by-side facts extracted from manager-published IM/PDS/SIPO documents. 0 fields match, 0 differ, 0 disclosed by only one fund.

Why these differ

Generated 2026-05-19 from the structured facts below. Verify against the source IM/PDS before relying on this summary for investment decisions.

The most material structural difference is asset class and liquidity profile. Devon Dividend Yield Fund invests in listed equities and offers daily redemptions with no notice period required, while Midlands Income Wholesale Fund allocates to private credit secured by first mortgages and requires 30 days' notice with redemptions processed at-exit rather than on demand. This distinction in underlying assets and exit mechanics is fundamental to how each fund behaves in stress scenarios.

Both are PIE unit trusts eligible for PIR taxation and distribute quarterly. Their gate provisions differ in character: Devon's IM states broadly that the manager has "the ability, in certain circumstances to suspend or defer redemptions," whereas Midlands discloses a specific threshold trigger — withdrawals exceeding 5% of units on issue within any three-month period may be redeemed by instalments or deferred at the manager's discretion. Midlands also discloses an LVR cap of 75% on first-mortgage security; Devon's IM does not specify an equivalent credit constraint, consistent with its equity mandate.

The minimum investment gap is significant: Devon requires NZD 10,000 versus Midlands' NZD 100,000. On fees, Devon discloses a 0.62% management fee plus a 10% performance fee; Midlands' IM does not include comparable fee figures in the data provided. Midlands' target return is defined as income "at a level which exceeds the average 3 month term deposit rate advertised by all relevant New Zealand registered banks," whereas Devon does not state a comparable target return benchmark. Supervisors differ — New Zealand Guardian Trust (Devon) versus Trustees Executors (Midlands).

Always verify all details against each fund's current source IM or PDS before making any investment decision.

Fact-by-fact comparison

verified inferred match differ one-side only

Source documents

Devon Dividend Yield Fund (Wholesale)

No documents ingested yet.

Midlands Income Wholesale Fund

No documents ingested yet.

Methodology

Facts extracted via Claude Sonnet 4.6 from manager-published IM/PDS/SIPO PDFs. Confidence tiers: ●verified (all required keys populated), ◐inferred (some required keys null), ○not on file. Where IM and SIPO/PDS disclose the same fact, verified takes precedence over inferred.

The “Why these differ” summary above is generated once per pair by Sonnet from the structured facts in this table and cached as JSON. It is regenerated when either fund’s facts change.

Wholesale-only — for eligible investors per FMCA Schedule 1. Not financial advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Verify each fact against the source IM/PDS before relying on it for investment decisions.