Devon Diversified Income Fund (Wholesale) vs Norfolk Mortgage Trust Fund
Side-by-side facts extracted from manager-published IM/PDS/SIPO documents. 0 fields match, 0 differ, 0 disclosed by only one fund.
Why these differ
Generated 2026-05-19 from the structured facts below. Verify against the source IM/PDS before relying on this summary for investment decisions.
The most material structural difference is asset class and liquidity profile. Devon Diversified Income Fund is a multi-asset income PIE investing across a range of income-generating assets, with daily redemptions available (subject to a general suspension power). Norfolk Mortgage Trust Fund is a private credit PIE lending exclusively via first-registered mortgages, with a 183-day redemption notice period and at-exit liquidity; its gate provisions are more precisely defined — redemptions may be suspended if requests exceed 5% of units within three months, and a unitholder meeting must be called if requests exceed 20% of units on issue. Devon's IM describes its gate more broadly: "we have the ability, in certain circumstances to suspend or defer redemptions."
On fees, the funds differ significantly: Devon charges 0.52% per annum versus Norfolk's 2.5%. Norfolk discloses a specific target return — "to exceed the Six-month term deposit rate (published by the RBNZ) by 1.4% per annum (after the deduction of fees and expenses)" — whereas Devon's IM does not state a comparable verbatim target return figure. Norfolk caps lending at 75% LVR on first-mortgage security; Devon's IM does not specify an equivalent credit constraint, reflecting its broader multi-asset mandate.
Both are PIE structures eligible for PIR tax treatment, both are unit trusts (Norfolk described simply as "Trust"), and both are Auckland-based. Devon's minimum investment is NZ$10,000 versus Norfolk's NZ$5,000. Distributions differ: Devon pays quarterly; Norfolk pays monthly. Norfolk has been operating since 2006 and is not wholesale-only; Devon's wholesale status is noted but inception date is not disclosed in the extracted data.
Always verify these details against each fund's current IM or PDS before making any investment decision.
Fact-by-fact comparison
Source documents
Devon Diversified Income Fund (Wholesale)
No documents ingested yet.
Methodology
Facts extracted via Claude Sonnet 4.6 from manager-published IM/PDS/SIPO PDFs. Confidence tiers: ●verified (all required keys populated), ◐inferred (some required keys null), ○not on file. Where IM and SIPO/PDS disclose the same fact, verified takes precedence over inferred.
The “Why these differ” summary above is generated once per pair by Sonnet from the structured facts in this table and cached as JSON. It is regenerated when either fund’s facts change.
Wholesale-only — for eligible investors per FMCA Schedule 1. Not financial advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Verify each fact against the source IM/PDS before relying on it for investment decisions.
