Devon Diversified Income Fund (Wholesale) vs Hunter Diversified Private Credit Fund
Side-by-side facts extracted from manager-published IM/PDS/SIPO documents. 0 fields match, 0 differ, 0 disclosed by only one fund.
Why these differ
Generated 2026-05-19 from the structured facts below. Verify against the source IM/PDS before relying on this summary for investment decisions.
The most material structural difference is asset class and liquidity profile. Devon Diversified Income Fund invests across a multi-asset income universe and offers daily redemptions, while Hunter Diversified Private Credit Fund is concentrated in private credit — an inherently less liquid asset class — and restricts redemptions to monthly. Hunter's gate provisions are also more explicit: its IM states suspensions "can last up to six months" and that the fund "may provide a partial (or zero) redemption" if liquidity is insufficient; Devon's IM acknowledges the ability to suspend or defer but does not specify a maximum suspension period or partial-redemption mechanic.
The minimum investment requirement differs substantially: Devon sets an entry point of NZD 10,000 versus Hunter's NZD 100,000. Management fees also diverge — Devon charges 0.52% versus Hunter's 0.83% — though the higher fee on Hunter reflects private-credit sourcing and due-diligence costs typical of that asset class. Hunter publishes a verbatim target return of "4% per annum higher than the New Zealand Official Cash Rate over a rolling 3-year period"; Devon's IM does not disclose a comparable target return figure. Both funds are PIE-eligible unit trusts sharing the same supervisor, The New Zealand Guardian Trust Company Limited, and both distribute quarterly. Hunter's inception date is recorded as December 2016; Devon's IM does not specify an inception date. Hunter's manager of record is Harbour Asset Management Limited, while Hunter Capital is the provider entity — readers should clarify that relationship in the source documents.
Always verify all details against the current IM, PDS, or SIPO before relying on this summary.
Fact-by-fact comparison
Source documents
Devon Diversified Income Fund (Wholesale)
No documents ingested yet.
Hunter Diversified Private Credit Fund
No documents ingested yet.
Methodology
Facts extracted via Claude Sonnet 4.6 from manager-published IM/PDS/SIPO PDFs. Confidence tiers: ●verified (all required keys populated), ◐inferred (some required keys null), ○not on file. Where IM and SIPO/PDS disclose the same fact, verified takes precedence over inferred.
The “Why these differ” summary above is generated once per pair by Sonnet from the structured facts in this table and cached as JSON. It is regenerated when either fund’s facts change.
Wholesale-only — for eligible investors per FMCA Schedule 1. Not financial advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Verify each fact against the source IM/PDS before relying on it for investment decisions.
