Skip to main content
Wholesale Investor NZWholesale Investor NZ

Devon Australian Fund (Wholesale) vs Midlands Income Wholesale Fund

Side-by-side facts extracted from manager-published IM/PDS/SIPO documents. 0 fields match, 0 differ, 0 disclosed by only one fund.

Why these differ

Generated 2026-05-19 from the structured facts below. Verify against the source IM/PDS before relying on this summary for investment decisions.

The most material structural difference is asset class and liquidity profile. Devon Australian Fund invests in Australasian equities — a listed, mark-to-market asset class — while Midlands Income Wholesale Fund deploys capital into private credit secured by first mortgages with a maximum LVR of 75%. This distinction drives nearly every other difference between the two funds.

Redemption terms reflect that gap directly. Devon offers daily redemptions, subject to a broadly stated suspension power: "we have the ability, in certain circumstances to suspend or defer redemptions." Midlands requires 30 days' notice and redeems at exit, with a more specific gate: withdrawals exceeding 5% of units on issue within any three-month window may be deferred or paid by instalments at the manager's discretion. Midlands' minimum investment is $100,000 against Devon's $10,000, and distributions are quarterly versus Devon's semi-annual cadence.

Both funds share the same legal structure (unit trust) and tax treatment (PIE, PIR-eligible). Management fees differ: Devon discloses 0.87%; Midlands' IM does not publish a comparable percentage figure. Midlands states a target return of "income return pre-tax (but after fees and expenses) at a level which exceeds the average 3 month term deposit rate advertised by all relevant New Zealand registered banks"; Devon's IM does not specify a stated target return. Devon's supervisor is New Zealand Guardian Trust; Midlands' is Trustees Executors Limited. Midlands' FSP number is not on file here; Devon is registered as FSP1581.

Verify all details against each fund's current IM or PDS before relying on this summary.

Fact-by-fact comparison

verified inferred match differ one-side only

Source documents

Devon Australian Fund (Wholesale)

No documents ingested yet.

Midlands Income Wholesale Fund

No documents ingested yet.

Methodology

Facts extracted via Claude Sonnet 4.6 from manager-published IM/PDS/SIPO PDFs. Confidence tiers: ●verified (all required keys populated), ◐inferred (some required keys null), ○not on file. Where IM and SIPO/PDS disclose the same fact, verified takes precedence over inferred.

The “Why these differ” summary above is generated once per pair by Sonnet from the structured facts in this table and cached as JSON. It is regenerated when either fund’s facts change.

Wholesale-only — for eligible investors per FMCA Schedule 1. Not financial advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Verify each fact against the source IM/PDS before relying on it for investment decisions.