Devon Australian Fund (Wholesale) vs Hunter Diversified Private Credit Fund
Side-by-side facts extracted from manager-published IM/PDS/SIPO documents. 0 fields match, 0 differ, 0 disclosed by only one fund.
Why these differ
Generated 2026-05-19 from the structured facts below. Verify against the source IM/PDS before relying on this summary for investment decisions.
The most material structural difference is asset class and return profile. Devon Australian Fund invests in Australasian equities, offering market-linked returns with no stated target, while Hunter Diversified Private Credit Fund targets illiquid private credit assets with an explicit return objective of "4% per annum higher than the New Zealand Official Cash Rate over a rolling 3-year period." This difference drives divergent liquidity terms: Devon offers daily redemptions, whereas Hunter operates on a monthly cycle and discloses more granular gate language — suspensions can last "up to six months" and partial or zero redemptions are possible if liquidity is insufficient. Devon's gate disclosure is broader and less specific on duration.
Both funds share the same supervisor (The New Zealand Guardian Trust Company Limited), PIE status, and unit trust structure. Management fees are close — Devon at 0.87% and Hunter at 0.83% — though Devon's IM does not disclose a performance fee position while Hunter's fee structure warrants direct verification. Distribution frequency differs: Devon pays semi-annually versus Hunter's quarterly. The minimum investment gap is significant: Devon requires NZ$10,000 against Hunter's NZ$100,000. Hunter discloses an inception date of December 2016; Devon's IM does not specify one. Hunter's manager of record is Harbour Asset Management Limited, while the provider is listed as Hunter Capital — investors should clarify the precise management relationship from source documents. Devon's IM does not specify an LVR or leverage cap; Hunter's IM does not either.
Always verify all details against the current source IM or PDS before relying on this summary.
Fact-by-fact comparison
Source documents
Devon Australian Fund (Wholesale)
No documents ingested yet.
Hunter Diversified Private Credit Fund
No documents ingested yet.
Methodology
Facts extracted via Claude Sonnet 4.6 from manager-published IM/PDS/SIPO PDFs. Confidence tiers: ●verified (all required keys populated), ◐inferred (some required keys null), ○not on file. Where IM and SIPO/PDS disclose the same fact, verified takes precedence over inferred.
The “Why these differ” summary above is generated once per pair by Sonnet from the structured facts in this table and cached as JSON. It is regenerated when either fund’s facts change.
Wholesale-only — for eligible investors per FMCA Schedule 1. Not financial advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Verify each fact against the source IM/PDS before relying on it for investment decisions.
