Devon Alpha Fund (Wholesale) vs PCG Diversified New Zealand Private Debt Fund
Side-by-side facts extracted from manager-published IM/PDS/SIPO documents. 0 fields match, 0 differ, 0 disclosed by only one fund.
Why these differ
Generated 2026-05-19 from the structured facts below. Verify against the source IM/PDS before relying on this summary for investment decisions.
The most material structural difference is asset class and risk profile: Devon Alpha Fund invests in Australasian listed equities, while PCG Diversified New Zealand Private Debt Fund allocates to private credit secured by first mortgages — two fundamentally different return drivers and liquidity profiles. Both are PIE unit trusts eligible for PIR taxation, managed out of Auckland.
Target returns differ modestly but meaningfully: Devon Alpha targets "Official Cash Rate (OCR) +5%" with a 12% hurdle rate before performance fees apply, while PCG targets "Reserve Bank of New Zealand Official Cash Rate + 4.0% (net of management fees and fund costs and before tax)." Devon's stated management fee is 0.87% versus PCG's 0.75%, though Devon's hurdle-rate structure means total cost depends heavily on outperformance. PCG's IM does not disclose a performance fee; Devon's IM does not specify an LVR cap on underlying exposures, while PCG's IM confirms first-mortgage security.
The minimum investment gap is significant: Devon requires NZD 10,000 versus PCG's NZD 125,000. Distribution frequency also differs — Devon pays semi-annually; PCG pays monthly, which may suit income-focused investors differently. Gate provisions exist in both, but PCG's IM specifies a precise 365-day maximum suspension window triggered partly by redemptions exceeding 5% of units in any three-month period; Devon's IM describes suspension powers without quantifying a cap or trigger threshold. Devon's supervisor is New Zealand Guardian Trust; PCG's is Public Trust. PCG discloses an inception date of March 2022; Devon's IM does not specify one.
Verify all details against each fund's current source IM or PDS before relying on this summary.
Fact-by-fact comparison
Source documents
PCG Diversified New Zealand Private Debt Fund
No documents ingested yet.
Methodology
Facts extracted via Claude Sonnet 4.6 from manager-published IM/PDS/SIPO PDFs. Confidence tiers: ●verified (all required keys populated), ◐inferred (some required keys null), ○not on file. Where IM and SIPO/PDS disclose the same fact, verified takes precedence over inferred.
The “Why these differ” summary above is generated once per pair by Sonnet from the structured facts in this table and cached as JSON. It is regenerated when either fund’s facts change.
Wholesale-only — for eligible investors per FMCA Schedule 1. Not financial advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Verify each fact against the source IM/PDS before relying on it for investment decisions.
