Skip to main content
Wholesale Investor NZWholesale Investor NZ

Devon Alpha Fund (Wholesale) vs Norfolk Mortgage Trust Fund

Side-by-side facts extracted from manager-published IM/PDS/SIPO documents. 2 fields match, 9 differ, 7 disclosed by only one fund.

Why these differ

Generated 2026-05-19 from the structured facts below. Verify against the source IM/PDS before relying on this summary for investment decisions.

The most material structural difference is asset class and return profile. Devon Alpha Fund invests in Australasian equities targeting "Official Cash Rate (OCR) +5%" with a 12% hurdle rate before performance fees apply, while Norfolk Mortgage Trust Fund deploys capital into first-mortgage private credit, targeting returns that "exceed the Six-month term deposit rate (published by the RBNZ) by 1.4% per annum (after the deduction of fees and expenses)." Devon Alpha carries equity market risk; Norfolk carries credit and property-secured lending risk with an LVR cap of 75% — a figure Devon's IM does not specify, given its equity mandate.

Liquidity terms differ meaningfully. Devon Alpha processes redemptions on request but may suspend or defer them without a defined threshold trigger. Norfolk imposes a 183-day redemption notice period and suspends redemptions if requests exceed 5% of units within three months, with a mandatory investor meeting required if requests breach 20% of units on issue.

Management fees diverge sharply: Devon Alpha charges 0.87% versus Norfolk's 2.5%. Distribution frequency also differs — Devon Alpha pays semi-annually; Norfolk pays monthly. Both are PIE structures eligible for PIR taxation and are supervised (Devon by NZ Guardian Trust; Norfolk by Public Trust). Both are domiciled in Auckland. Minimum investment is lower for Norfolk ($5,000) than Devon Alpha ($10,000). Norfolk discloses an inception date of 2006; Devon's IM does not specify one. Norfolk is not wholesale-only; Devon Alpha is positioned as a wholesale fund.

Verify all details against each fund's current source IM or PDS before making any investment decision.

Fact-by-fact comparison

verified inferred match differ one-side only

Performance

FieldDevon Alpha Fund (Wholesale)Norfolk Mortgage Trust FundStatus
Target returnOfficial Cash Rate (OCR) +5%to exceed the Six-month term deposit rate (published by the RBNZ) by 1.4% per annum (after the deduction of fees and expenses)
Minimum investment10,0005,000
Distribution frequencysemi-annuallymonthly
Inception(not on file)2006

Structure

FieldDevon Alpha Fund (Wholesale)Norfolk Mortgage Trust FundStatus
Fund structureUnit TrustTrust
Wholesale-only?(not on file)No
PIE-structured?YesYes
PIR eligible?YesYes
Asset classAustralasian equitiesprivate credit

Lending

FieldDevon Alpha Fund (Wholesale)Norfolk Mortgage Trust FundStatus
Security type(not on file)first mortgage
LVR cap (%)(not on file)75

Fees

FieldDevon Alpha Fund (Wholesale)Norfolk Mortgage Trust FundStatus
Management fee (%)0.872.5
Hurdle rate (%)12(not on file)

Liquidity

FieldDevon Alpha Fund (Wholesale)Norfolk Mortgage Trust FundStatus
Redemption frequency(not on file)at-exit
Redemption notice (days)(not on file)183
Gate provisionsWe have the ability, in certain circumstances to suspend or defer redemptions. In the event that this should ever occur, you can still submit a redemption request and these will be processed, in the order in which they are received, once the suspension or deferral has been lifted.Manager may suspend redemptions if redemption requests exceed 5% of units within a 3 month period, or any economic or political circumstances which could affect the assets or business activities of the Trust. If requests within 3 months relate to more than 20% of units on issue, Manager may suspend redemptions and must call a meeting of investors.

Entities

FieldDevon Alpha Fund (Wholesale)Norfolk Mortgage Trust FundStatus
Manager entityDevon Funds Management LimitedNorfolk Mortgage Management Limited
SupervisorThe New Zealand Guardian Trust Company LimitedPublic Trust

Methodology

Facts extracted via Claude Sonnet 4.6 from manager-published IM/PDS/SIPO PDFs. Confidence tiers: ●verified (all required keys populated), ◐inferred (some required keys null), ○not on file. Where IM and SIPO/PDS disclose the same fact, verified takes precedence over inferred.

The “Why these differ” summary above is generated once per pair by Sonnet from the structured facts in this table and cached as JSON. It is regenerated when either fund’s facts change.

Wholesale-only — for eligible investors per FMCA Schedule 1. Not financial advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Verify each fact against the source IM/PDS before relying on it for investment decisions.