CQuest Forestry Fund vs MyFarm KiwiFruit Fund
Side-by-side facts extracted from manager-published IM/PDS/SIPO documents. 0 fields match, 0 differ, 0 disclosed by only one fund.
Why these differ
Generated 2026-05-20 from the structured facts below. Verify against the source IM/PDS before relying on this summary for investment decisions.
The most material structural difference between these two funds is their legal form and liquidity profile. CQuest Forestry Fund is structured as a Limited Partnership with an inception date of 2025 and no redemption mechanism disclosed in the extracted data, implying capital is locked up for the investment's lifetime — consistent with forestry's long biological growth cycles. MyFarm KiwiFruit Fund, by contrast, offers quarterly redemptions and quarterly cash distributions, providing meaningfully more liquidity for investors who may need periodic access to capital.
Both funds are managed by the same entity, MyFarm Investments (FSP1003795, Christchurch), and are restricted to wholesale investors only. Their return targets are broadly comparable: CQuest targets "9-12% p.a. IRR (target internal rate of return over the investment's lifetime)" while KiwiFruit targets a "Targeted long-term total return, including cash distributions and capital growth, of 10% p.a." — though these metrics are not directly equivalent, as IRR and total-return figures measure performance differently.
Asset classification also diverges: CQuest is categorised as forestry, while KiwiFruit is classified as property, reflecting its kiwifruit orchard and land exposure. KiwiFruit discloses AUM of approximately NZD 210 million and AIP eligibility; CQuest's IM does not specify AUM or AIP status. The minimum investment for CQuest is NZD 50,000; KiwiFruit's IM does not specify a minimum in the extracted data. Neither fund is structured as a PIE.
Verify all details against the source IM or PDS before making any investment decision.
Fact-by-fact comparison
Source documents
Methodology
Facts extracted via Claude Sonnet 4.6 from manager-published IM/PDS/SIPO PDFs. Confidence tiers: ●verified (all required keys populated), ◐inferred (some required keys null), ○not on file. Where IM and SIPO/PDS disclose the same fact, verified takes precedence over inferred.
The “Why these differ” summary above is generated once per pair by Sonnet from the structured facts in this table and cached as JSON. It is regenerated when either fund’s facts change.
Wholesale-only — for eligible investors per FMCA Schedule 1. Not financial advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Verify each fact against the source IM/PDS before relying on it for investment decisions.
